Skip to content

AI quality intelligence

Code fast.Catch bugs faster.

Product knowledge reveals what the feature missed. Every PR is checked against your codebase. Robotesta writes and runs the right tests.

Robotesta finds rules new work overlooked, finds what a PR can break elsewhere, writes and runs the tests the change needs, and turns production signals into what to test next.
See it work

Why now

Code got faster.
Verification became the bottleneck.

More change now moves through the same review, testing, and verification capacity.

01 · Change

AI multiplied the change.

More features, fixes, and experiments are landing every day.

Nearly 2×PR output
“We shipped three changes before lunch.”

Fast coding only works if verification can keep up.

Speed moved forward. Quality work moved downstream — without the context the code was written from.

Sources & methodology
Faros · AI software engineering research, 2025

Observational telemetry across more than 10K developers and 1,255 teams. Used for +98% PR output and +91% review time. “Nearly 2×” and “≈2×” are simplified Robotesta renderings of those reported uplifts.

Open source ↗
Faros · The Speed Trap, 2026

Telemetry across 22K developers and 4K teams. Used for +300.6% time in QA and +125.4% monthly incidents. “≈4×” and “≈2.25×” are Robotesta calculations from the reported increases. 2025 and 2026 are separate snapshots, not one continuous YoY series.

Open source ↗

The missing context

Software changes faster than a team can reconstruct what each change depends on.

Part of the bottleneck is volume. The part that ships bugs is context: the author didn't have it, the review didn't have it, and the tests were written from the same ticket.

RequirementA workspace always keeps at least one owner.

Decision #61Access removal must be immediate.

Issue #184A removed member kept authenticated access.

Approved designReassign owned resources before removal.

Codebasemembership-service · session-service · realtime authorization

CoverageActive session revocation — not covered.

RO-218

As a workspace admin, I can remove a member from my workspace.

6 things from 5 sources

RequirementA workspace always keeps at least one owner.

Decision #61Access removal must be immediate.

Issue #184A removed member kept authenticated access.

Approved designReassign owned resources before removal.

Codebasemembership-service · session-service · realtime authorization

CoverageActive session revocation — not covered.

Not what the change touches. What it was meant to do. Robotesta reconstructs the product around the change before anything is written.

context engineering

How it works

It works out what must be true. Then it proves it.

One change, followed from the ticket to the release decision.

RO-218StoryRefiningIllustrative example

Remove workspace member

As a workspace admin, I can remove a member from my workspace.

Acceptance criteria

None yet.

  1. A sole owner cannot be removed.
  2. Owned resources are reassigned before removal.
  3. All active access ends the moment a member is removed.
  4. The audit history of the member's actions remains.

Evidence

Where it lives

Inside the tools your team already uses.

Robotesta reads from them, acts in them, and writes evidence back to them.

  • Jira
  • GitHub
  • CI / PR gate
  • Robotesta web app
  • CLI & API for coding agents

Connected tools

  • Jira
  • Confluence
  • GitHub
  • Figma
  • TestRail
  • Jest
  • Playwright
  • GitHub Actions
  • AWS
  • Sentry
  • Google Analytics 4
  • PagerDuty

Evidence intake · formats and endpoints, not connectors

  • OpenAPI
  • JUnit XML
  • OTLP
  • File / CSV
  • REST / Webhook

Connected tools are hosted integrations. Evidence intake accepts what your pipeline already produces.

Teams we've worked with

From e-commerce to fintech.

See it on your change

Bring one ticket. Leave with the quality contract for it.

Thirty minutes, your Jira, your repo. Robotesta shows what must be true, what is already covered, and what it would check, before anything is written.

See it work

Product · Engineering · QA · Technical leaders